For the sheer fun of it, I had created an image of President Donald Trump as a pastiche on Andy Warhol, a little “old Warhol-style.” It took me about 15 minutes and there was nothing political about it – it was merely a fun exercise.
Here it is:
I posted it on my Instagram account and it was liked at least as much as most other stuff I post there. Then I got the idea to use it as an ad with a CTA – Click To Action – for people to take a look at my Instagram profile – a frequently used method to get people interested in who you are and what you do and then, perhaps follow you.
I designed it, put a few words on my ad, defined the audience to be reached and chose to promote it with US$ 20. And sent it off. It took twenty minutes, or so, until Instagram – which is owned by Facebook – sends me this message:
“Your ad was not approved because your Page has not been authorized to run ads with political content.” This is followed by two links, one on which I can appeal – which I did at no avail. The other tells me how to complete the authorization process (to publish ads with political content in the future.
But I do not use Instagram for any political purpose, also not for the foundation I’m directing, The Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research (TFF). Have never done so. I use it exclusively for things related to art – my own and somebody else’s. So, I did not try to be authorized to do ads with political content.
Let me make it clear: Instagram/Facebook did not prevent me from having this image on my feed. What they prevented is that it is used as image in an ad that aims to promote my Instagram account.
My problem with this is that Facebook decides to categorize this image as “political” and not as art. This means that any image of a politician – irrespective of the text and context – is “political.”
Now, if such an image of a politician re-done in Warhol-style is political – what could not also be judged as “political”?
Another problem is: What do the people at Facebook know about art and about politics? And is this at all decided by humans or does Facebook/Instagram use some kind of face/image recognition, alternatively AI (articificial intelligence) that “catches” such an image and automatically, without a view to purpose, text and context, deems this political?
I wonder because anyone with the minimum of knowledge about art would be able to see that the image itself is not political but, as I said, a quick exercise in artistic re-production, pastiche or – if anything – a caricature or poking fun of Andy Warhol.
We seem to live in times where across-the-board, digitally manipulated political correctness can be used anywhere by corporate and other interests (and governments) who are afraid of being “misunderstood” by someone somewhere.
I may not have monitored it all, but in my view there is far too little discussion about this type of clear-cut censorship of the arts. After all, it’s no small audience; as of June 2018, Instagram . worldwide
Here is another image – related to Facebook’s bizarre definition of nudity.
It was shot at Art Basel 2018, the world’s most important and largest art fair. It’s from an installation in one of the almost 300 exhibiting galleries:
Same procedure as above. Here is what I got back this time:
“Your ad wasn’t approved because it doesn’t follow our Advertising Policies. We don’t allow ads that depict nudity, even if it is not sexual in nature. Keep in mind that, except for statues, this applies to all educational and artistic forms of expression. How fix: We suggest using a different image or video and checking that the destination link is compliant too.”
So nudity, even it not sexual in nature, is prohibited! There goes a large part of Western art history – since it includes “all educational and artistic forms of expression”!
When you click the above link in the Instagram message it goes to Point 8 which deals with Adult products or services. But surprise, surprise! That point deals exclusively with ads for contraceptives!
This is how Facebook sees an unacceptable “suggestive” content for contraceptives in an art installation…
Take a look at my image. The figure playing the violin is a wax model, a dummy or whatever you’d call it, with a blond wig. It’s not at all a photo of a nude woman.
The context is perfectly clear, she sits a podium, there are works of art around and there is a person who walks around to perceive and judge about it as a piece of art.
To Facebook, this is nudity and nudity related to contraceptives at that! Just read Point 8 above.
Now, have fun and read also Facebook’s Point 9 about Adult content. Have a look at the pictures all of which are deemed ‘non-compliant’ – for being explicit artistic, showing a woman in a sexually suggestive pose, provocative and alluding to sexual activity. Oh my!
One wonders in what century Facebook people live? Or whether they’ve asked some religious sect to advise them?
If it wasn’t so sad – and so important – for both art and freedom of expression, I would laugh my sure non–compliant ass off.
You would too. Please share. This is a policy non-compliant with any reasonable definition of art and it is implemented in bizarre ways – either by ignorant human fools or wrongly programmed AI.
It must go! As simple as that!
Oh, how time flies! It’s about two months since I posted here and we’re already well into 2018.
I have an excuse, an acceptable one, I think: I’m working fulltime for peace!
But, first – here the three main points in this belated New Year greeting:
• The last two months devoted to peace
• 8 short videos to inspire you
• Dreams and plans including Lund, China and Venice.
Walking on two legs but still looking for the right balance
While I am a photographer who experiments with what “peace photography” could be, I’m also a professional peace and future researcher and director at The Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research, TFF, in Lund, Sweden.
And, so, there are periods during which I have to devote myself to international affairs. It’s not entirely voluntary, I must say, because I really feel I need the artistic activity, the “flow” and the intuitive exploration of the world around me – to balance my research life which is more disciplined, methodical, and – supposedly, at least – rational.
And I would add, there is much much more positive energy in working with art than working with international affairs.
My main occupation is to argue against most of the horrific (nuclear) weapons and wars (can’t know about or cover them all…) and other violence and argue for the simple, logical principle embedded in the UN Charter, namely that peace shall be brought about by peaceful means (Article 1).
Think about it: That is what all the UN member governments have signed once upon a time. And completely ignore every single day.
So I have two identities or persona. I walk on two legs and I cannot always find the right balance.
The shadow of certain world events throws itself over the fields of art and photography where I’d like to spend much more time.
So to solve that impossible equation – two fulltime jobs – what do you do?
Well you study management and you develop practical, daily working methods, you work basically all the time – which is possible when you love what you do and you don’t do it for money (all I do with TFF is unpaid, we’re an all-volunteer foundation). While I have little income, I live a rich life. I don’t complain – just I need 48 hours per day at least and living till I’m 120. That’s all…
As if you were there…Enjoy!
More info on the link. Welcome!
The video Walk Around # 2
My studio in October 2017
Open anytime but by appointment only on
firstname.lastname@example.org or +46 738 525200
My “Three-In-One” exhibition with 1) some earlier photographs in new editions on on other media, 2) 25 documentary photos from the liberation of Aleppo, Syria in December 2016 – much suffering and much hope – and 3) multi-media photo collages.
This short video – posted on Instagram – takes you around one of the rooms of my studio where there are, at the moment 113 numbered works on the list.
My studio is open anytime but by appointment only on either +46 (0)738 525200 or email@example.com.
You are very welcome online as well as ‘live’.
I’m in the process of updating and re-designing my photo homepage. It is not yet ready but there are works to see anyhow. Here.
And here a glimpse of Art Night on October 21, 2017:
This post is updated with new images, latest on October 19, 2017
This “Three-In-One” exhibition opened on the “Night Of Culture” in Lund, September 16 16-22, at Vegagatan 25.
Then I did a few new things and changed some of those presented – that’s one of the joys with collages… – and, so, this is also the collection of works that are on show when it was “Art Night” in Lund, Sweden, on October 21, 2017.
And here the poster:
The show has three categories:
• Déjà Vu.
Some earlier works that have been enhanced through re-editing and re-printing.
Here is one example, “Natalia And Gerhard Richter”:
• Hope and Suffering in Aleppo, Syria
Unique, strong images of the suffering people who came out from 4,5 years of occupation but were also expressing joy and hope.
You may get an impression of these documentary photos here.
• Multi-media photo collages.
The first is pretty self-explanatory. The second category will be explained by myself, in particular during an event 19:00-19:30 for those present.
The third is something new for me, a colourful, happy experiment contrasting the Syria series.
How did I do the latter?
I’ve taken some of my old and new photos and combined them with all kinds of stuff and media: Japanese fabrics and papers, very old calligraphy books on silk paper, old yellow newspapers, art magazines and Sotheby catalogues, cut some flee market paintings in pieces and combined it all into collages – mounted on papers, copper, steel and cardboard.
Here some of it…
On some I’ve also applied acrylic paint and oil sticks (oil colours that you paint with like crayons and not with brushes).
Continue reading “Déjà Vu, Syria And Multi-Media Photo Collages – The “Three In One” exhibit”